Linux encrypt - Rexploit
<==============================>
|| Linux Encrypting ||
|| by ||
|| William M. Hidalgo ||
|| redkommie<@>gmail.com ||
|| 02/25/05 ||
<==============================>
.: Contents :.
I. INTRO
- About
II. ENCRYPTING
- Containers
- Drives
- Files
APPENDIX
.: I. INTRO :.
[-=] About [=-]
This is a quick rundown on how to encrypt files, containers, and drives under
Linux. The use of loopback encrypted filesystems and openssl is explained
and examples are given. This paper should have you encrypting in no time. The
following commands were done running kernel 2.6.9.
Thursday, October 06, 2005
COTSE-I have no such right
No I didn't write the articles from COTSE, I wish I had, but Steve made them, they are all his, I just agree with him completely
COTSE-I have no such right:
I do not have a right not to be offended. If speech offends me I do not have a right to ban it. If a thought offends me I do not have a right to claim that it should not be expressed. Yet all this politically correct bullshit is showing me that this is untrue, that if someone finds it offensive then it should be banned. This is wrong.
Too much concern is being placed upon 'is it offensive to anyone'. This entire approach falls apart fast if you try to apply it fairly. If the hypothetical 'they' have a right not to be offended then I must have that same right, correct? Well, that is good because I'm offended when someone else takes offense at something.
Oops, instant 'I'm offended' checkmate. Who counts more, the person offended at something or me offended at him being offended? I quickly find out it is not me. As a heterosexual white male minority I have no rights and so I am usually just ignored. But wait, that's not applying it fairly.
Ok, so I do not have the right to never have my beliefs challenged. I do not have the right to never be offended by anything. But if that is true then neither does anyone else. Why? Because there is no such right that can be fairly applied. If I find something offensive, I can speak out in opposition to it or I can ignore it, but I could not in any fairness ban it without stepping on someone else's rights.
The world is a massive mixture of cultures, beliefs, and ideals, so many differences that everything is offensive to someone somewhere. If everyone was given the right to never be offended it would mean that no belief or culture could ever be challenged. This is because if applied fairly it would mean 'I'm offended' checkmate nearly every time.
For example, I'm offended by little unidentified red things in macaroni salad and I think they should be banned. Even if I did have that right, I wouldn't be able to ban it anyway. Because certainly someone out there would claim that any macaroni salad"
COTSE-I have no such right:
I do not have a right not to be offended. If speech offends me I do not have a right to ban it. If a thought offends me I do not have a right to claim that it should not be expressed. Yet all this politically correct bullshit is showing me that this is untrue, that if someone finds it offensive then it should be banned. This is wrong.
Too much concern is being placed upon 'is it offensive to anyone'. This entire approach falls apart fast if you try to apply it fairly. If the hypothetical 'they' have a right not to be offended then I must have that same right, correct? Well, that is good because I'm offended when someone else takes offense at something.
Oops, instant 'I'm offended' checkmate. Who counts more, the person offended at something or me offended at him being offended? I quickly find out it is not me. As a heterosexual white male minority I have no rights and so I am usually just ignored. But wait, that's not applying it fairly.
Ok, so I do not have the right to never have my beliefs challenged. I do not have the right to never be offended by anything. But if that is true then neither does anyone else. Why? Because there is no such right that can be fairly applied. If I find something offensive, I can speak out in opposition to it or I can ignore it, but I could not in any fairness ban it without stepping on someone else's rights.
The world is a massive mixture of cultures, beliefs, and ideals, so many differences that everything is offensive to someone somewhere. If everyone was given the right to never be offended it would mean that no belief or culture could ever be challenged. This is because if applied fairly it would mean 'I'm offended' checkmate nearly every time.
For example, I'm offended by little unidentified red things in macaroni salad and I think they should be banned. Even if I did have that right, I wouldn't be able to ban it anyway. Because certainly someone out there would claim that any macaroni salad"
COTSE-What happened to my country?
COTSE-What happened to my country?:
Yes, it's time for another rant. Americans are showing themselves to be a weak people, it's pitiful. We are willingly trashing our own rights in the name of protection from terrorists. Not for protection, just for the idea of it. What happened to the image of a bunch of American rednecks not afraid of a damn thing, the 'if it bleeds it can die' group. What happened to those people? When did we all become such easily lead fearful sheep? Why are we giving away our rights in the name of protection, especially when we appear to be doing it out of fear and effectively just throwing them away?
Do you want protection from terrorism? Then just be aware. Increase your awareness of your surroundings. Stop going through every day in a self-absorbed cloud. Wake up and watch for the unusual. Did someone set down a bag on a bus and walk away quickly? Report it right away. Someone acting funny? Take notice and do something. Throwing away your rights willy nilly because someone told you that if you did they'd protect you is not the right way. It's not bringing you safety and they don't come back as easy as they go. It's far easier to get a bill passed giving away freedom than it is to get one passed granting it. This is because power granted is power used and power used is power kept. That is why power must have proper checks and balances, if not it becomes power abused. Wake up, we are removing those checks and balances. This power is being misused already and they still want more.
Sure they want more, they wanted more to track 60's radicals, then to stop organized crime, then drugs, then pedophiles (think of the children), but none of that worked. Then came terrorists and you freaked out and willingly gave away those rights you denied them before. They've always wanted more. They've always desired to remove those checks and balances because they get in the way. It's so much easier to chase bad guys when you can sneak into their "
Yes, it's time for another rant. Americans are showing themselves to be a weak people, it's pitiful. We are willingly trashing our own rights in the name of protection from terrorists. Not for protection, just for the idea of it. What happened to the image of a bunch of American rednecks not afraid of a damn thing, the 'if it bleeds it can die' group. What happened to those people? When did we all become such easily lead fearful sheep? Why are we giving away our rights in the name of protection, especially when we appear to be doing it out of fear and effectively just throwing them away?
Do you want protection from terrorism? Then just be aware. Increase your awareness of your surroundings. Stop going through every day in a self-absorbed cloud. Wake up and watch for the unusual. Did someone set down a bag on a bus and walk away quickly? Report it right away. Someone acting funny? Take notice and do something. Throwing away your rights willy nilly because someone told you that if you did they'd protect you is not the right way. It's not bringing you safety and they don't come back as easy as they go. It's far easier to get a bill passed giving away freedom than it is to get one passed granting it. This is because power granted is power used and power used is power kept. That is why power must have proper checks and balances, if not it becomes power abused. Wake up, we are removing those checks and balances. This power is being misused already and they still want more.
Sure they want more, they wanted more to track 60's radicals, then to stop organized crime, then drugs, then pedophiles (think of the children), but none of that worked. Then came terrorists and you freaked out and willingly gave away those rights you denied them before. They've always wanted more. They've always desired to remove those checks and balances because they get in the way. It's so much easier to chase bad guys when you can sneak into their "
Monday, October 03, 2005
New Keyboard
well just got a nice pretty new white Mac Pro keyboard. feels nice, looks tiny, least compared to what I am used to seeing and working with. Now if I could just get the damn Windoze machine to play nice with the USB KVM I now have instead of the old PS/2 style I was using I will be good to go..
For the record my new KVM is a IOGEAR MiniView Micro USB Plus, 2-port KVM with built-in cables and Audio Support. Model #GCS632U, nice little guy, replaced the Older IOGEAR PS/2 MiniView i was running (also with built in cables but without audio support.
For the record my new KVM is a IOGEAR MiniView Micro USB Plus, 2-port KVM with built-in cables and Audio Support. Model #GCS632U, nice little guy, replaced the Older IOGEAR PS/2 MiniView i was running (also with built in cables but without audio support.
Saturday, October 01, 2005
The zBox Supercomputer at the Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Zurich
The zBox Supercomputer at the Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Zurich
Now this would make a hell of a Distributed.Net number cruncher :P
Now this would make a hell of a Distributed.Net number cruncher :P
Friday, September 30, 2005
More Birthday stuff
Well got to the range today, still need to make that a solid monthly occurrence, always a good way to let off steam, and keeps my muscle memory up. Course now I need to call Austin and order more ammo, damn having a favorite ammo that is only from one store in a city 200 odd miles away :/
Ahh well, guess I should get in to reloading, would save me a little money and I could always get the ammo the way I want and like it to be.
Ahh well, guess I should get in to reloading, would save me a little money and I could always get the ammo the way I want and like it to be.
Birthdays
well, another year, another birthday :/
fun fun fun
Why is it people make a big deal about birthdays. just another day in my mind pretty much,
maybe I will buy myself something, I am planning on going to the range, need to do that anyway, been a month or so since I did any shooting, Always helps to keep in practice, builds muscle memory (which comes in handy)
Ahh well, to finish my few tweaks for the night and see if I can get any sleep.
fun fun fun
Why is it people make a big deal about birthdays. just another day in my mind pretty much,
maybe I will buy myself something, I am planning on going to the range, need to do that anyway, been a month or so since I did any shooting, Always helps to keep in practice, builds muscle memory (which comes in handy)
Ahh well, to finish my few tweaks for the night and see if I can get any sleep.
Thursday, September 29, 2005
Macenstein: Mac stuff dug up on the web and pieced together into an unholy monster
I truely love this, about as un-PC as you can be, frelling love it. Bout time someone let off like this :)
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
Mike Tech Show: Mike Tech Show - Podcast - #30 - 09-24-05
Nice collection of usefull tools to keep on a USB key, I have used one similar for years with my basic computer files as I call them, things I need on any machine I load my "Essintial list"
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
Record your life...
Ever forget something that you possibly said last year during a friends party when you were drunk. A guy created something that he used for 3 years now recording his conversations and takes it home to this program that transcribes and organizes everything into text that you can search and go back to later and hear the audio from it.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Re-Ripping
So I am sitting here, re-ripping my Harry Potter collection of Books on CD, for the 5th time I think, hoping I can get rip of the skips and bumps I got last time :/
no clue how I got that errors in there, but I did, so I am redoing it, and since I have gotten my iPod I don’t have to worry about the short naming scheme I did with my iRiver (blew it up :( ahh well the drive is now my pocket storage device)
So I am now going with a more interesting naming, I can finally use chapter naming instead of some silly naming convention of title acronym disc and track number :-s
no clue how I got that errors in there, but I did, so I am redoing it, and since I have gotten my iPod I don’t have to worry about the short naming scheme I did with my iRiver (blew it up :( ahh well the drive is now my pocket storage device)
So I am now going with a more interesting naming, I can finally use chapter naming instead of some silly naming convention of title acronym disc and track number :-s
Thursday, September 22, 2005
Arrested for being a geek
"The police decided that wearing a rain jacket, carrying a rucksack with a laptop inside, looking down at the steps while going into a tube station and checking your phone for messages just ticked too many boxes on their checklist and makes you a terrorist suspect."
Talk about some of the most screwed up stuff I have read in a while.
Hell I went thru an intergation and 9 month long "investigation" because a co-worker turned me in for making "threats" to fellow employees. Not once did they interview anyone else I worked with about my joking (I have a dark sense of humor, only damn way to deal witht he bullshit out there lately) I have since been fired for making a bloody joke, took em 9 months to figure out I was not a threat and I have no real idea if my record has been cleaned. Fucking annoying is what this shit is.
read more | digg story
Talk about some of the most screwed up stuff I have read in a while.
Hell I went thru an intergation and 9 month long "investigation" because a co-worker turned me in for making "threats" to fellow employees. Not once did they interview anyone else I worked with about my joking (I have a dark sense of humor, only damn way to deal witht he bullshit out there lately) I have since been fired for making a bloody joke, took em 9 months to figure out I was not a threat and I have no real idea if my record has been cleaned. Fucking annoying is what this shit is.
read more | digg story
Monday, September 19, 2005
Testing this thing out
Let’s see how MacJournal plays with my Blogger account, would hate to drop money on a piece of shit :P
Welcome to MacJournal!
Use the Journals toolbar item to see your journals, and use the Entries item to see the entries for that journal. You can delete this entry to get started (or just make a new one).
I hope you enjoy using MacJournal!
I hope you enjoy using MacJournal!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)